My name is Mark Goodfield. Welcome to The Blunt Bean Counter ™, a blog that shares my thoughts on income taxes, finance and the psychology of money. I am a Chartered Professional Accountant. This blog is meant for everyone, but in particular for high net worth individuals and owners of private corporations. My posts are blunt, opinionated and even have a twist of humour/sarcasm. You've been warned. Please note the blog posts are time sensitive and subject to changes in legislation or law.
Showing posts with label risk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label risk. Show all posts

Monday, June 15, 2020

Benchmarking your investments - now and forever

As I write this introduction on June 13, the stock markets have recovered spectacularly from their March lows.

Whether they continue to climb is subject to debate. Some market watchers think the recovery will be quicker than expected. They remind us that the indexes are made up of several large companies that have weathered the COVID storm to date. Those companies will also likely benefit in the near term, as they will be able to acquire less fortunate companies at attractive prices. These market watchers suggest the markets are just reflecting the future.

Others think the markets are not reflecting reality either currently or down the road, as consumer spending will be dampened for years. I have no idea who is correct, and I am not sure anyone really does.

Today’s blog post on benchmarking was initially conceived by my colleague Carmen McHale to be an education piece on what benchmarking is and how it can be used. It morphed, however, to include some discussion on benchmarking and COVID.

I have read and been inundated with articles, commentary and newsletters on investing during COVID and have been considering how my clients and I have fared during COVID. As you will quickly realize after reading Carmen’s post, benchmarking is not as simple as it seems. Neither is finding the right benchmarks for your investments. A 60% equity/40% fixed income portfolio can vary widely. The 60% can be all equities, mostly U.S., an even mix across Canada, U.S. and international, or 40% equities, 10% hedges, 10% real estate; and the 40% fixed income can be all bonds, or bonds and preferred shares (personal pet peeve, I don’t like preferred being classified as fixed income, but that is a topic for another day). So finding an apples-to-apples benchmark is very difficult.

So how does one benchmark their advisors’ investment returns (if they are not provided appropriate comparisons by their advisor) during COVID – or their own for that matter? Personally, I like the suggestion made by Ian McGugan in a recent Globe and Mail article (if you are not a Globe and Mail subscriber, access to the article may not be available).

While Ian’s article is on constructing a portfolio going forward, he makes a valuable remark near the end of the article on balanced portfolios: “even if you conclude these products aren’t right for you, they can provide a good baseline for comparison with other approaches in these unclear, unsettled and unknowable times.” For the week ending June 12, I looked at the year-to-date returns of a few balanced funds (typically 58% equity/42% bond or so) and their YTD losses ranged, but were about 1.6% on average. As Ian says, these may not be appropriate funds or benchmarks for you, but they are good baseline comparatives.

I think this just became my most long-winded introduction in the history of the blog, so without further ado, here is Carmen.

_________________

By Carmen McHale


A benchmark is information that helps you compare the performance of your investments. I tell clients that if they are going to pay someone to manage their investments, they should expect to get returns that are at least as good as the benchmark after fees.

Indexes such as the S&P 500 are common benchmarks to assess investment performance. In fact, some investors invest through mutual funds or exchange traded funds that simply follow the index – this is often called passive investing.

By comparing your performance against a relevant benchmark index, it is possible to see how much value an active manager adds (or does not add) over a passive approach. It allows you to evaluate the performance of your portfolio and how much of the total return comes from investment decisions that were made by the advisor versus the movements of the financial markets overall.

Benchmarking for risk


When comparing your returns against the benchmarks, it is equally important to see how much risk your portfolio is taking verses the benchmarks. Benchmarking for risk allows you to see how consistent the returns are over time, and can give you an idea of if your investments are taking on more risk than the benchmark.

Risk can be measured in many ways. However, I personally like to use standard deviation, as most investors can easily understand this metric, and it is published by most mutual funds. A fund with higher standard deviation has more price volatility, while a lower standard deviation tends to produce returns that are more predictable.

See this example of balanced fund returns over the last five years. In this fairly typical case, the portfolio consists of 35% fixed income, 32.5% Canadian equities, 27.5% global equities and 5% cash.


 Year         Portfolio Return
(Net of fees)
    
 Benchmark Return
 2015 5.33%3.87% 
 2016 5.86%8.32% 
 2017 9.54%7.88% 
 2018 -1.66% -2.26%
 2019 16.73% 15.65%
 5 -YEAR AVERAGE 7.16% 6.69%
 STANDARD DEVIATION 6.71% 6.57%
 Range of returns at 1 Standard Deviation 0.45% to 13.87% 0.12% to 13.26%
 Range of returns at 2 Standard Deviations -6.26% to 20.58% -6.45% to 19.83%
 Range of returns at 3 Standard Deviations -12.97% to 27.29% -13.02% to 26.4%

The standard deviation of this portfolio is 6.71% while the standard deviation of the benchmark over the five years was 6.57%, but what does that mean?

Standard deviation explained


From a high level, it is apparent that this portfolio manager managed to get higher average returns over the five years, despite taking on similar risk as did the benchmark.

Now think back to your statistics classes. If you can’t quite recall the details, here’s a refresher on the basics of standard deviation. When assessing how much risk you have in your portfolio, it is wise to look at three standard deviations so you can get an idea of the potential downside you could experience in any one year (like the beginning of 2020). Here’s what three standard deviations mean with our portfolio and benchmark:
  • One standard deviation - If the data behaves in a normal curve, then 68% of the data points will fall within one standard deviation of the average, which means 68% of the time your portfolio should produce returns between 0.45% and 13.87%, while the benchmark should produce returns between 0.12% and 13.26%.
  • Two standard deviations - If you want to capture what happens 95% of the time, you go to two standard deviations from the mean. Returns should fall between -6.26% and 20.58%, while the benchmark should produce a range from -6.45% to 19.83%.
  • Three standard deviations - How about the other 5% of the time? Take it to three standard deviations to get 99.73% of the time – which means your portfolio in any given year should return between -12.97% and 27.29%, while the comparable benchmark should produce a range between -13.02% and 26.4%.
To keep matters, as simple as possible, I like to boil it down to one number to compare by dividing the five-year average return over the standard deviation (return to risk ratio):

                    Portfolio return/risk = 106.71%; Benchmark return/risk = 101.83%.

The higher the ratio, the better, so our model portfolio should perform well against the benchmark.

Our typical portfolio during COVID-19


The onset of COVID-19 can be considered an extreme shock to the economic environment, so let’s examine how this typical portfolio performed against the benchmark during this time.

The same portfolio example above had a negative return of -8.94% as of March 31, 2020 compared to the benchmark return of -9.44%. The returns of the portfolio were well within three standard deviations (-13.02% noted above). The portfolio not only has superior returns when they are in positive territory, but also demonstrated less downside in a volatile market environment.

Minimum acceptable return


When benchmarking investments for my clients, I also like to calculate something called Roy’s Safety-First Ratio, or simply SFRatio. This allows clients to see what would happen if their investments perform at less than expected returns. To do this, we create a minimum acceptable return, or threshold return. By fixing a minimum return, an investor aims to reduce the risk of not achieving the investment return.

Let’s imagine your financial plan indicates a minimum required average return of 4.25%. Now you have three portfolios to choose from:

  • Portfolio A: expected return - 13%; standard deviation - 20%
  • Portfolio B: expected return - 9%; standard deviation - 11%
  • Portfolio C: expected return - 8%; standard deviation - 6%

Which portfolio should you choose?


If you want to have the portfolio that has the highest likelihood of meeting your required return, you can calculate the SFRatio. Here is that formula:
  • Expected return of the portfolio; minus 
  • Minimum required return; divided by 
  • Standard deviation of the portfolio. 
Using this formula, here are your three SFRatios for these portfolios:
  • Portfolio A: (13% - 4.25%)/20% = 0.4375
  • Portfolio B: (9% - 4.25%)/11% = 0.4318
  • Portfolio C: (8% - 4.25%)/6% = 0.625
As you can see, Portfolio C has the highest SFRatio, and therefore has the highest probability of earning the investor their required rate of return.

Benchmarking during COVID-19


These days, financial projections are a bit of a tough call. It’s not just that the economy may look quite different in the next five to 10 years from its profile over the past decade. It’s also that their impact on the markets is difficult to predict.

Benchmarking for performance during COVID-19 is as relevant as it’s ever been. The benchmarks you use should cover the same periods of time, and you will see how your investments perform against other potential investments.

The true difference-marker during COVID-19 is benchmarking for risk. With volatility so high, risk skyrockets, so keep on the eye on the ups and downs of your investments. If there ever was a time to know that your portfolio is taking on more risk than the benchmark, COVID-19 is that time.

For more in investing during COVID-19, check out this recent roundtable discussion on protecting your wealth in the COVID-10 economy.

The content on this blog has been carefully prepared, but it has been written in general terms and should be seen as broad guidance only. The blog cannot be relied upon to cover specific situations and you should not act, or refrain from acting, upon the information contained therein without obtaining specific professional advice. Please contact BDO Canada LLP to discuss these matters in the context of your particular circumstances. BDO Canada LLP, its partners, employees and agents do not accept or assume any liability or duty of care for any loss arising from any action taken or not taken by anyone in reliance on the information on this blog or for any decision based on it.

Please note the blog posts are time sensitive and subject to changes in legislation.

BDO Canada LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership, is a member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms. BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms.

Monday, June 24, 2013

Paying Cash to Avoid HST– What’s in it for the Contractor/Service Provider?

A few weeks ago while waiting in line at the bank, I overhead a customer in front of me bragging to his friend about how he had saved several hundred dollars in HST by paying a painter in cash. I thought to myself, besides being illegal, this guy was totally oblivious to additional tax benefits he had conveyed upon the service person by paying him the full price of the service, sans HST. So, I thought today, I would discuss the overlooked aspect of why (other than competitive pressures) any supplier, service provider, contractor, professional etc. would agree to an illegal act by accepting cash for their services?

This question brought me back to an article Roma Luciw of the Globe and Mail wrote in September, 2012, titled “Most Canadians have paid under the table to avoid tax" in which she stated that “Most Canadians have paid cash in order to avoid the sting of taxes – and they don’t feel bad about it either, according to a new poll.” Roma noted that for 2008, Statistics Canada reported the underground economy in Canada to be in the ballpark of $36 billion dollars – a staggering figure.

I was quoted in Roma’s article as saying the following: “Retailers and contractors who get paid under the table are clearly evading income tax. They would not only be subject to income tax on any sales not reported but potentially subject to penalties for tax evasion." I also suggested that "Contractors and retailers run the risk that consumers will snitch on them to the CRA, if the good or service does not meet their expectations, while consumers risk having no legal recourse without an invoice for the goods or services.”

Any cash payment for services or goods has two distinct components: (1) the avoidance of HST and (2) as I note above, the avoidance of income tax. I don’t think many people give much thought to the second issue when they pay cash for services, so that’s the area I want to key on in my post today.

Let’s return to the person in line at the bank. It is clear he illegally saved 13% in HST and based on Roma’s article and the attitude of most Canadians, he probably did not lose much sleep over the matter. But how about the painter who provided the service, how did he make out? Let’s take a look at his situation.

Say the bank-goer paid the painter $1,000 in cash. Let’s also assume that the painter paid his assistants $400 in cash to help paint the house. 
  • The painter collects $1,000 in cash.
  • He then pays $400 in cash to his workers.
  • He now has $600 (tax free) under his mattress.



But what if the bank-goer had refused to pay cash and the painter recorded the transaction properly in his books?



  • The painter (in Ontario) would have collected $1,130 including HST.
  • He would then remit $130 in HST to the CRA (it is important to note, the painter is essentially a tax collector for HST and there is no cost to actually collect HST since he receives $130 HST and then just remits it to the CRA).
  • The painter now has $1,000.
  • He then issues cheques totalling $400 to his assistants as either salary or subcontract fees.
  • The painter would report $1,000 of income in his books and claim an expense for $400, leaving $600 to be taxed.
  • Assuming the contractor is in or would be in the 35% income tax bracket if he reported all his income, he would owe $210 of income tax ($600 profit x 35%).
  • At the end of the day he, the painter would have $390 left ($600 - $210 tax).

Based on the above, although illegal, the painter benefited by $210 because he accepted cash. The bank-goer saved $130 by paying cash. So essentially, the painter benefited 1.5 times the bank-goer for the risk he took in evading both HST and income tax; some would argue that is an illegal win-win for both the consumer and service provider.

What if the $1,000 cash was paid to a professional who did not require any assistance in providing his/her professional services? He or she would receive $1,000 and would keep it all. Since the professional would probably be in the 46% tax bracket, they would save $460 by accepting the cash. In this circumstance, their tax savings would be approximately three and a half times the savings of the person not paying the HST on the service provided.


It goes without saying that not paying HST and income tax is illegal. I am not in any way condoning the payment of cash. My intention in posting this blog is to point out how much money leaks out of the system when people pay for services or goods in cash and how the service provider benefits to a much greater extent than the consumer for taking the risk of evading income tax.

Stock Market Challenge for Charity


I would like to take a minute to point out an initiative that I think is worthwhile and fun for stock pickers and closet stock pickers alike. I’ve participated in the Blog for Financial Literacy Campaign and created the Bloggers for Charity Initiative … and as you know, I feel strongly that everyone should work towards financial literacy and help those less fortunate wherever and however possible.

Steps Foundation, an organization that supports financial literacy education programs in Toronto, is holding its “Bay Street Stock Market Challenge” this week (June 25-July 26) to raise money for financial literacy education. I hope you have time to check it out and test your market and investment knowledge with their virtual stock and option trading. (I’m told you are given $100,000 USD and $100,000 CAD of virtual money. The participant with the highest portfolio value at the end is the winner and claims 50% of the event’s proceeds).

As a side note, a portion of the funds raised during the competition will help Steps Foundation continue to fund a debt management clinic at WoodGreen, a charity my firm has been actively involved with. The firm and staff have donated money and one year the whole firm spent a day during the summer building furniture for the single mothers who work hard to get education and jobs to provide for their children.

So please consider entering the contest and supporting financial literacy, although it will be tough trying to beat me :).

The blogs posted on The Blunt Bean Counter provide information of a general nature. These posts should not be considered specific advice; as each reader's personal financial situation is unique and fact specific. Please contact a professional advisor prior to implementing or acting upon any of the information contained in one of the blogs.

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Covered Calls

Investors are always looking to reduce their risk in owning a specific stock. One method to reduce that risk is to use a covered call strategy.

Selling covered calls is a strategy in which an investor sells a call option contract while at the same time owning an equivalent number of shares in the underlying stock. It is considered to be one of the safest option strategies in the market.

In simple terms a covered call means you sell a call option to another investor which entitles them to purchase a stock you already own at a specified price. The concept is best illustrated by an example.

You purchase 100 shares of Research and Motion for $58/share and agree to sell it for $60 on the third Friday of the following month.  You receive $4/share for selling this call option. The return calculation is as follows:

Cost of 100 shares at $58/share                        $   5,800
Call premium received – 100 @ $4  ****                     400      - 7% return immediately

If the stock price is above $60 at strike
date, investor receives another $2 ($60-$58)               200      - 3% return

Total return on investment is                                    $600      - 10%

**** The $400 call premium is a capital gain in the year it is received and is not a reduction in the cost base. See my comment to Anonymous in the comment section below for the income tax treatment

If the stock price is below $60 at strike date, the stock will not be called and you will keep the $400 time premium.  However, you have lowered your out of pocket cost of your investment to $5,400 and you still own the stock. Please note that you must hold the stock until the call is exercised or expires.

The downside to using this strategy is that if the stock price rises above $60 you do not participate in any of the upside above $60. Therefore, using a covered call may be more risky for a stock like Research in Motion which can swing dramatically, than for a stock like the Royal Bank, but that would be reflected in the premium you get for selling the call.

In the case of a stock such as Bell Canada that pays dividends, one has to be aware that the  call holders may want to capture the dividend and that has to be factored in.

As often happens in blogging, someone else covers the topic of your blog before you post it. An excellent  detailed step by step summary of the mechanics of writing a covered call are covered in this blog by The Million Dollar Journey.

Please understand that I am in no way recommending a covered call strategy. I am only discussing the concept so you are aware of its existence. The use of a covered call is complex and you should consult with your investment advisor before undertaking such a strategy or if you trade yourself, ensure you grasp the complexities in doing such.

The blogs posted on The Blunt Bean Counter provide information of a general nature. These posts should not be considered specific advice; as each reader's personal financial situation is unique and fact specific. Please contact a professional advisor prior to implementing or acting upon any of the information contained in one of the blogs.