My name is Mark Goodfield. Welcome to The Blunt Bean Counter ™, a blog that shares my thoughts on income taxes, finance and the psychology of money. I am a Chartered Professional Accountant. This blog is meant for everyone, but in particular for high net worth individuals and owners of private corporations. My posts are blunt, opinionated and even have a twist of humour/sarcasm. You've been warned. Please note the blog posts are time sensitive and subject to changes in legislation or law.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

2011 Ontario Non- Budget: Yawn Part Deux

If the 2011 Federal budget was a yawn from an income tax measure perspective, then the Ontario budget could be considered the Federal budget on Sominex.

The Ontario Minister of Finance, Dwight Duncan, today presented the Ontario Budget. For those who wish to read my firm’s (Cunningham LLP) summary, unfortunately, there is not one. My firm decided it was not worth the effort, since there is absolutely nothing in the budget.

As an aside, whether you are a Liberal supporter or not, has there ever been a premier that has left less of an impression over eight or so years than Dalton McGuinty?

I guess Ontario is just running on all cylinders and thus there was no need for any income tax measures to improve the provinces performance. Trying to be even handed, some may say McGuinty is in a catch-22 situation. The Federal Liberals are in the middle of an election and are publicly against any more tax cuts, so how could he, as a Liberal, make any tax cuts in Ontario? On the other hand, he can’t increase tax rates because he is facing an election in October of this year and is seeking a third term.

The blogs posted on The Blunt Bean Counter provide information of a general nature. These posts should not be considered specific advice; as each reader's personal financial situation is unique and fact specific. Please contact a professional advisor prior to implementing or acting upon any of the information contained in one of the blogs.

Your House is your Castle

I have written a guest blog entitled Your principle residence is tax exempt for Jim Yih on his Retire Happy Blog.

The blog is about claiming your principal residence exemption and what is required if you turn your principal residence into a rental property.

Thanks to Jim for providing a forum for my three guest posts; Big Brother (Canada Revenue Agency) is Watching, Tax Tips from a Blunt Bean Counter and the above blog on principal residences.

The blogs posted on The Blunt Bean Counter provide information of a general nature. These posts should not be considered specific advice; as each reader's personal financial situation is unique and fact specific. Please contact a professional advisor prior to implementing or acting upon any of the information contained in one of the blogs.

Monday, March 28, 2011

Personal Use Property - Taxable even if the Picasso Walks Out the Door

I will start today’s blog with a question. What do stamps, duck decoys, hockey cards, dolls, coins, comics, art, books, toys and lamps have in common?

If you answered that the collection of these items are hobbies, you are partially correct. What you may not know is, that these hobbies also generate some of the most valuable collectibles in the world.

When a collector dies and leaves these types of collectibles to the next generation, the collectibles can cause rifts amongst family members. The rifts may occur in regard to which child is entitled to ownership of which collectible and whether the income tax liability related to these collectibles should be reported by the family members.

Let’s examine these issues one at a time. Many of these collectibles somehow miss being included in wills. I think the reason for this is two-fold. The first reason is that some parents truly do not recognize the value of some of these collectibles, and the second more likely reason is, that they do realize the value and they don't want these assets to come to the attention of the tax authorities by including them in their will (a third potential reason is that your parents frequented disco's in the 70's and they took Gloria Gaynor singing "Walk out the Door" literally- but I digress and I am showing my age).

Two issues arise when collectibles are ignored in wills:
  1. The parents take a huge leap of faith that their children will sort out the ownership of these assets in a detached and non-emotional manner, which is very unlikely, especially if the collectibles have wide ranging values; and
  2. The collectibles in many cases will trigger an income tax liability if the deceased was the last surviving spouse or the collectibles were not left to a surviving spouse. 
Collectibles are considered personal-use property. Personal-use property is divided into two sub-categories, one being listed personal property (“LPP”), the category most of the above collectibles fall into, and the other category being regular personal-use property (“PUP”).

PUP refers to items that are owned primarily for the personal use or enjoyment by your family and yourself. It includes all personal and household items, such as furniture, automobiles, boats, a cottage, and other similar properties. These type properties, other than the cottage or certain types of antiques and collectibles (e.g. classic automobiles), typically decline in value. You cannot claim a capital loss on PUP.

For PUP,  where the proceeds received when you sell the item are less than $1,000 (or if the market value of the item is less than $1,000 if your parent passes away) there is no capital gain or loss. Where the proceeds of disposition are greater than $1,000 (or the market value at the date a parent passes away is greater than $1,000) there maybe a capital gain. Where the proceeds are greater than $1,000 (or the market value greater than $1,000 when a parent passes away), the adjusted cost base (“ACB”) will be deemed to be the greater of $1,000 or the actual ACB (i.e. generally the amount originally paid) in determining any capital gain that must be reported. Thus, the Canada Revenue Agency essentially provides you with a minimum ACB of $1,000.

LPP typically increases in value over time. LPP includes all or any part of any interest in or any right to the following properties:

  1. prints, etchings, drawings, paintings, sculptures, or other similar works of art; 
  2. jewellery; 
  3. rare folios, rare manuscripts, or rare books; 
  4. stamps; and 
  5. coins. 
Capital gains on LPP are calculated in the same manner as capital gains on PUP. Capital losses on LPP where the ACB exceeds the $1,000 minimum noted above, may be applied against future LPP capital gains, although as noted above, these type items tend to increase in value.

The taxation of collectibles becomes especially interesting upon the death of the last spouse to die. There is a deemed disposition of the asset at death. For example, if your parents were lucky or smart enough to have purchased art from a member of the Group of Seven many years ago for say $2,000 and the art is now worth $50,000, there would be a capital gain of $48,000 upon the death of the last spouse (assuming the art had been transferred to that spouse upon the death of the first spouse). That deemed capital gain has to be reported on the terminal income tax return of the last surviving spouse. The income tax on that gain could be as high as $11,000.

The above noted tax liability is why some families decide to let the collectibles “Walk out the Door.” However, by allowing the collectibles to walk, family members who are executors can potentially be held liable for any income tax not reported by the estate and thus, should tread carefully in distributing assets such as collectibles. (As an aside, starting next week, I will begin a three part series on executors).

If you are an avid collector, it may make sense to have the collectibles initially purchased in a child’s name. You should speak to a tax professional before considering such, as you need to be careful in navigating the income attribution tax rules.

Where the above alternative is not practical or desirable, you should ensure that you have set aside funds or even taken out life insurance in order to cover the income tax liability stemming from these collectibles that may arise upon your death.

The blogs posted on The Blunt Bean Counter provide information of a general nature. These posts should not be considered specific advice; as each reader's personal financial situation is unique and fact specific. Please contact a professional advisor prior to implementing or acting upon any of the information contained in one of the blogs.

Friday, March 25, 2011

Confessions of a Tax Accountant-Week 4-Tracking the ACB of your Securities and Income Trust Units

Just to change it up this week, instead of blaming the March 31st issuance of T3’s and T5013’s for the fact that as of today I still have only received approximately 22% of my client’s income tax returns; I will blame last weeks March break, and the fact clients were too preoccupied with their families to worry about submitting their income tax returns.

During the past week, two issues arose that I would like to discuss in more detail.

Tracking your Adjusted Cost Base

This week, one of my staff members emailed me that he could not complete a client’s tax return because he was missing the adjusted cost base (“ACB”) on several of my clients stock dispositions during the year. He advised me that the underlying issue was that the client had transferred brokers twice over the last few years and consequently, the client, not to mention the brokers, have lost track of the original ACB on several stocks.

This email raises two issues:

  1. There is no consistency amongst the various Canadian brokerages in regard to tracking clients ACB's in their trading and margin accounts. A few institutions attempt to track their clients ACB's, but most just provide the current stock price and no historical cost base information.
  2. Once securities have been moved amongst brokerages; for those institutions that actually attempt to track the ACB, it is a total "crap shoot" whether the monthly statements from your new broker will reflect an accurate ACB .
It is thus imperative, that you maintain the original acquisition costs of all security purchases. Since every brokerage firm in Canada provides a yearly transaction summary, all you have to do is keep that one yearly capital transaction summary in a file. If you can manage this small filing task, you will have a historical ACB for all your stock purchases; really not an arduous task.

I have not even broached the topic of foreign holdings, for which the tracking of the ACB is a nightmare in most cases. In the few circumstances brokers even consider tracking such, often the wrong exchange rate is used, or worse yet, the brokerage converts the initial cost at the same rate as the current years sale.

A related issue that arose this week is the tracking of the ACB for income trusts units. Where you own an income trust unit (this issue will diminish going forward as many income trusts have converted to corporations) you receive a T3 and box 42 of the T3 denotes the return of capital (“ROC”) you have received each year from the income trust. In order to determine the proper ACB of a trust unit sold or alternatively, converted to a corporate share (the old ACB of your trust share in most cases will be your new ACB for the corporate share, as most conversions were done on a tax deferred rollover basis) you must reduce what you actually paid for the trust units by the ROC reported in box 42 each year. Many clients do not track the historical return of capital (luckily in many cases they can be found on the Internet) or even know when they purchased the units initially (which is problematic even when you can find the ROC for prior years).

So the moral of the ACB story is; a little record keeping goes a long way.

[Bloggers Note: In my Confessions of a Tax Accountant blogs, I will discuss real income tax issues that arise, but embellish or slightly change facts to protect the innocent, as the saying goes.]

The blogs posted on The Blunt Bean Counter provide information of a general nature. These posts should not be considered specific advice; as each reader's personal financial situation is unique and fact specific. Please contact a professional advisor prior to implementing or acting upon any of the information contained in one of the blogs.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

2011 Federal Budget- "Yawn"- What Should have been Considered

The Minister of Finance, Jim Flaherty, today presented the Federal Budget. For those who wish to read my firm’s (Cunningham LLP) summary of the 2011 budget, please click the preceding link.

In order that there is no confusion, given the link to my firm above, the following are my comments and views and they do not necessarily reflect those of my firm.

In my opinion, this was a nothing budget, with piddling income tax credits and an over abundance of anti-avoidance measures. Most likely given the political climate, much of what was proposed today may never see the light of day. I will comment on a couple items of interest, but I do not feel like rehashing this budget; if a rehash is what you desire, there are multiple media outlets where you can read such.

There were only two items I found of interest and that is because I am a tax accountant. I would suggest, most readers will not be intrigued by either of these two items.

1. The proposal to restrict the donation of flow-through shares from the exemption from capital gains tax is interesting to me, since it has been part of the "packaging" by those who sell these investments; buy the flow-through, get a 100% write-off, then either sell the shares to utilize prior capital losses or donate the shares and obtain a donation.

2. The proposal to eliminate the partnership deferral will impact certain clients of mine. Often a partnership would be established with say a May 31st year end, while the corporate partner(s) would have say an April 30th year end. So, for example, the partnerships May 31, 2010 income would not be taxed and picked up by the corporate partners until their April 30, 2011 year-end, resulting in a deferral of almost a year. This proposed change is similar to the phase-out several years ago of the tax deferral for those of you who were self-employed with off-calender year-ends.

So, what do I think middle and higher income tax bracket taxpayers and entrepreneurs who own their own private corporations would have liked to have seen in today's budget?

How about any of the following: 
  • Allowing child care expenses to be deducted by either parent (currently only deductible by the lower wage earner)
  • Expanding the $750,000 capital gains exemption to include the sale of assets where greater than 90% of the business is sold (many purchasers will not purchase shares for liability reasons and thus, many small business owners cannot access the $750,000 exemption)
  • Providing a second $750,000 capital gains exemption for any business owner who sells one business and starts a second and at the time of the sale of the second business has a minimum of say 20 employees
  • Increase in the small business deduction limit to $600,000 (currently $500,000), or a reduction in the corporate tax rate on the first $500,000 of taxable income to encourage job creation
  • Changes to the minimum RRIF withdrawal rules
  • An increase in the RRSP contribution limit
  • An increase in the TFSA contribution limit
  • Reduction in personal taxes rates
  • And going for the gusto, a $100,000 exemption in addition to the principal residence exemption to be applied against the capital gains of second properties, be it your city home or cottage
And, yes, I am seeing a doctor for my delusional thoughts :)

The blogs posted on The Blunt Bean Counter provide information of a general nature. These posts should not be considered specific advice; as each reader's personal financial situation is unique and fact specific. Please contact a professional advisor prior to implementing or acting upon any of the information contained in one of the blogs.

Monday, March 21, 2011

Reading Financial Statements For Dummies

Today I will discuss some simple tips to utilize when reading financial statements (that clicking sound you just heard are the other readers hitting the escape button when they saw reading and financial statements used in the same sentence). For the two of you still here,"Dummies" is of course used in the popular culture context; however, in the case of reading financial statements, I often feel like one and I am an accountant.
If you are a non-accountant, what should you look for when reviewing a company’s financial statements? I will assume you do not have the background to review such technical items as the accounting policies to determine how revenue is recognized or such; so here are a few simple things non-accountants can look for in the financials:

1. Cash is always king, so always include a review of the statement of cash flows, especially in the case of mature companies. None other then Warren Buffett says "it’s good to compare how much different cash flow is from net income: if the latter is substantially higher than the former, you could have some aggressive accounting to worry about" (see Larry MacDonald's blog Buffet on accounting manipulation for further Buffett comments).

2. For those with a sense of accounting adventure, you can try and calculate the Current Ratio and Debt Ratio:
The current ratio measures liquidity, (a sense of a company's ability to meet its short-term liabilities with liquid assets) and is calculated by dividing Current Assets by Current Liabilities. A ratio of 1:1 implies adequate coverage and the higher above 1:1 the better. If it is relatively low and declining, that is not a good sign.
A company's debt ratio is calculated by dividing Total Liabilities by Total Assets (or alternatively, Total debt divided by Total Assets). This ratio tells you the extent by which a company’s assets have been financed with debt. For example, a debt ratio of 40% indicates that 40% of the company's assets have been financed with borrowed funds. Debt can be good or bad. In times of economic stress or rising interest rates, companies with high debt ratios can experience financial problems. During good times, debt can enhance profitability by financing growth at a lower cost.

3. If you have always wished for a "Coles Notes" summary of the financial statements you are in luck. Effective for all periods ending on or after December 15, 2010 new audit standards in Canada will result in changes to the auditor’s report, which will make it far simpler for investors of any sophistication to determine the key issues in the statements. One major change is the requirement for an “Emphasis of Matter” paragraph in the auditor's report. Companies will now be required to highlight matters that are disclosed in the financial statements that are of such importance, they are fundamental to the users’ understanding of the financial statements. The issues noted in the Emphasis of Matter discussion are disclosed elsewhere in the financial statement notes, but the new paragraph prevents companies from being able to hide these issues in the many pages of notes.

4. The notes to the financial statements are ignored by many novice investors, but the notes often have important nuggets of information. One of the first notes on any set of financials are the accounting policies and accounting estimates notes. For most non accountants, trying to follow and understand the accounting policies and estimates will be futile, however, if these notes disclose a change, try your best to understand the impact of the change on the F/S which should be disclosed in the case of a change in policy. You should also always read the “Subsequent Events” note to determine if anything of a substantial nature has changed for the company that is not reflected in the financial statements. The commitments note will inform you of any required outlays over the next several years and finally the contingency note, which will inform you of potential lawsuits and such. Some of these items may not be disclosed in the Emphasis of Matters note discussed in #3 above.

5. Most public company financial statements reveal how many fully diluted shares are outstanding. I like to see what constitutes that number, so I add together the common shares issued, stock options outstanding and warrants issued. Then I review the terms of the the warrants and options to get a feel for the stock price at which maximum dilution would occur.

6. If you are looking at anything less than a “large cap” company, potential financings must always be considered. I have been sideswiped on several occasions by a private placement or financings at a discount to the current stock price that have deflated a stock on the move. I like to see enough cash on the balance sheet to sustain the business for at least 18-24 months so the company is not hand to mouth each month, although for some small cap stocks, it may be closer to 12 months. For these type companies, the Management Discussion and Analysis will often provide the burn rate for the company. If the burn rate is provided, divide the total of the actual cash on hand, plus short term investments, plus the accounts receivable (a little tricky, but assume A/R is a fairly consistent number) less the accounts payable by the burn rate and you will have a crude idea of how many months of cash the company has available.

The above are just some simple review steps that even non-accountants should be able to undertake to gain a better insight into the companies they have stock ownership in.

The blogs posted on The Blunt Bean Counter provide information of a general nature. These posts should not be considered specific advice; as each reader's personal financial situation is unique and fact specific. Please contact a professional advisor prior to implementing or acting upon any of the information contained in one of the blogs.

Friday, March 18, 2011

Confessions of a Tax Accountant - Week 3- Last Years Missed Medical and Charitable Donation Receipts

I have received 30 client income tax returns to date, I still have over 190 outstanding. I provide these figures to provide support for my blog Personal Income Tax Filing Delays-Late and Amended T-slips, in which I discuss the havoc that the March 31st filing deadline for T3’s and T5013’s causes for accountants and tax preparers by condensing the income tax filing season into a 3-4 week period. I would suggest this havoc wreaked upon income tax preparers can only be detrimental to the Canada Revenue Agency's ("CRA")  clients, that being you the taxpayer or our clients in this specific situation.

Careful to not hurt myself stepping off my soapbox, this week I encountered two very common income tax filing issues. In reviewing a clients income tax return, I found mixed in together with my clients 2010 donation receipts, a donation slip for 2009. Another client had a summary orthodontic bill (many clients lose their medical receipts and ask for a summary print out from the massage therapist, orthodontist etc) for their son that included a substantial amount of work for 2009 that qualified as a medical expense.I discuss how to deal with these issues below.

Last Years Charitable Donations and Medical Receipts

As charitable donations can be carried forward to any five subsequent years, we typically include a prior year’s donation slip in the current years return. We have never had an issue with the CRA in this regard. If the donation was substantial, we would probably file a T1 adjustment to be safe. However, if you are like most people and have missed a $25 or $100 donation from 2009, I would just include them with your 2010  donations in preparing your return.

Last years medical receipts are more problematic. Medical expenses may be claimed for any twelve month period ending in 2010. Thus, if you missed a large 2009 medical expense, you may want to either file a T1 adjustment for the prior year to include the receipt or if you used a twelve month period that was not the calender year, you may want to file a T1 adjustment to change the twelve month period ending in 2009. Alternatively, you may want to consider including the receipt in a twelve month period ending in 2010.

Unfortunately for medical expenses, calculations are often required for the different permutations and combinations of filing scenarios.

It should be noted that the 12 month period ending in the year may be varied from year to year and these periods can overlap. However, obviously you cannot claim the same medical expense twice if you overlap the periods.

[Bloggers Note: In my Confessions of a Tax Accountant blogs, I will discuss real income tax issues that arise, but embellish or slightly change facts to protect the innocent, as the saying goes.]

The blogs posted on The Blunt Bean Counter provide information of a general nature. These posts should not be considered specific advice; as each reader's personal financial situation is unique and fact specific. Please contact a professional advisor prior to implementing or acting upon any of the information contained in one of the blogs.