My name is Mark Goodfield. Welcome to The Blunt Bean Counter ™, a blog that shares my thoughts on income taxes, finance and the psychology of money. I am a Chartered Professional Accountant. This blog is meant for everyone, but in particular for high net worth individuals and owners of private corporations. My posts are blunt, opinionated and even have a twist of humour/sarcasm. You've been warned. Please note the blog posts are time sensitive and subject to changes in legislation or law.
Showing posts with label flow through. Show all posts
Showing posts with label flow through. Show all posts

Monday, March 16, 2015

Tax Planning for Low Oil Prices

The recent plunge in the price of oil has hurt many stock portfolios. Yet, as with most market corrections, some people see great opportunity going forward, while others see portfolio pain.


As an accountant I cannot provide investment advice and thus will not state my opinion on where I see the price of oil going. However, I can provide income tax planning advice, and today I give you two tax planning considerations in relation to the price of oil.

Tax-Loss Selling


The first tax planning consideration is whether or not you should sell some of your oil and oil related stocks to realize a capital loss. Any decision to sell should not be a tax loss tail wagging the dog decision, but based on a considered investment decision by you and/or your investment advisor. 

If you decide it is prudent to sell some or your oil stocks to realize a capital loss (whether today or later in the year), you can use that loss against any capital gains you realize in 2015, or carry the loss back up to three years. I have a very detailed discussion of how to use capital losses in my blog “Tax-Loss Selling”.

Flow-Through Limited Partnership


A second, less obvious consideration, is the use of a flow-through limited partnership (“flow-through”). I had not really put my mind to this alternative until a client recently told me that they felt that the price of oil was at a bottom, or near a bottom, and was there anything they could do if they were willing to wait up to two years for a rebound. Once they said two years, a light bulb went on in my brain, as most flow-throughs must be held approximately two years until they convert to publicly sale-able stocks.

Before I get into the details, I think a quick primer on flow-throughs would be useful.

What is a Flow-Through?


An oil and gas flow-through, in very simple terms, is a limited partnership that invests in shares issued in a variety of junior oil and gas companies. The essence of this type of investment is that the partnership vehicle provides for the various oil and gas exploration deductions to “flow-through” to individual investors.

In simple terms, if you pay $10,000 for a unit of an oil and gas flow-through that is exploration based (development based flow-throughs will have lower deductions allocated), you will receive approximately $10,000 in income tax deductions that can be utilized in your personal income tax return. Most of the deductions are in year one and the remaining in year two. Assuming you are in the highest marginal tax rate, you would save almost $5,000 in taxes making your out-of-pocket cost $5,000 after claiming the flow-through deductions.

Most limited partnerships are subsequently rolled on a tax-deferred basis into a mutual fund that can be sold on the market within two years. Carrying on with our example, let’s say that in two years the limited partnership is rolled into ABC Mutual Fund and you immediately sell your unit for $10,000. The cost base of the investment is reduced to zero because of the deductions noted above, so you would owe capital gains tax of approximately $2,500 at the highest marginal tax rate ($10,000 gain x 25%). Your after-tax return on your investment would be $2,500 ($10,000 proceeds on the sale of your mutual fund, less $2,5000 tax + $5,000 tax savings − $10,000 initial cost). Flow-throughs provide some downside protection for your investment risk, as you would break even in this case in two years if you could sell your shares/mutual fund units for approximately $6,700. If you have capital loss carryforwards you do not expect to use, the flow-through becomes even more attractive as the capital gain can be offset by your capital loss carryforwards.

Of course, you and/or your advisor may feel it more prudent to purchase oil stocks or oil ETFs in lieu of a flow-through. I am just providing a tax option, not an investment opinion.

Back to my client’s original question. Since they believe the price of oil is at, or near a low, and they are willing to hold their investment for at least two years, a flow-through can be very effective in two ways. First, they will receive the income tax deductions resulting in current tax savings. Second , if they are correct in their assessment on the current and future price of oil (again, this is their thought, not my opinion) and say the partnership value grows to $15,000 within two years and they sell when the flow-through is converted to a mutual fund; using the $10,000 original purchase price from above, they will realize an after-tax return of $6,250 on their $10,000 investment ($15,000 proceeds on the sale of  the fund, less $3,750 tax plus the tax savings of  $5,000, less $10,000 initial cost).

To re-iterate; I have just set forth a tax planning option if you and/or your advisor feel it is a good time to purchase oil stocks. This is first and foremost an investment decision and I provide no guidance on such.

This site provides general information on various tax issues and other matters. The information is not intended to constitute professional advice and may not be appropriate for a specific individual or fact situation. It is written by the author solely in their personal capacity and cannot be attributed to the accounting firm with which they are affiliated. It is not intended to constitute professional advice, and neither the author nor the firm with which the author is associated shall accept any liability in respect of any reliance on the information contained herein. Readers should always consult with their professional advisors in respect of their particular situation.

Monday, July 21, 2014

CRA Audit- Will I Be Selected?

This summer I am posting the "best of" The Blunt Bean Counter while I work on my golf game (after this weekend's 2 birdie, 5 par and 3 triple bogey performance, I still need lots of work on my consistency). Today, I am re-posting a February, 2011 blog on your chances of being selected for audit. This is my third most read post of all-time and has over 150 comments; I wonder why :)

CRA Audit- Will I Be Selected?


I am often asked how the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) selects its audit victims; oops, I meant to say taxpayers subject to audit. Through experience I know certain taxpayers, certain claims and certain industries seem to trigger audits. With that in mind, I will list below what I have seen and how I believe the CRA selects certain individuals and businesses for audit.

Reasons for Individuals and Corporations

 

I would suggest there is nothing worse than a scorned lover, a business partner you have had a falling out with or a dismissed employee to trigger a CRA audit. These individuals know your little secrets; a cash deal here, an offshore account there and a conference you expensed that was really a vacation. These people are also vindictive and in some cases, they make statements and claims that are not factual in nature; however, the claims are enough to bring the CRA to your door.

Update: The CRA has introduced the "snitch line" which offers a reward for tipsters who inform on taxpayers hiding money offshore, as per this National Post Article.

CRA also loves net worth audits. These are audits undertaken because you live in a 3,000 square foot home, have a Porsche and kids in private school, and yet show minimal income on your tax return. Typically the CRA either stumbles upon these situations, or information from one of the individuals noted in the preceding paragraph provides a lead.

Reasons Specific to Individuals


We see far more desk audits (information requests in regard to certain deductions claimed) than full blown audits for individuals. You can expect an inquiry if you claim any of the following:
  • a significant interest expense,
  • an allowable business investment loss (usually if you held shares in a bankrupt private Canadian company),
  • tuition from a university outside Canada (typically the child and parent are tied together as most children transfer $5,000 of their tuition claim to their parents),
  • a child care claim for a nanny; even if you have filed a T4 for the nanny with CRA. Why CRA cannot crosscheck their records is baffling and befuddling.
In all the above cases you are just providing back-up information, these are not audits.

In past years individuals who purchased any tax shelter other than an oil & gas or mineral flow through have been audited. However, in most cases the CRA is auditing the tax shelter itself and the individual investors just get reassessed personally.

Full blown audits seem to occur with regularity in regard to individuals who earn commission income or self employment income and claim expenses against that income. In those cases, CRA gravitates to auto expense claims, requesting logs books they know one in 100 people actually keep, and advertising and promotion expenses they consider personal in nature.

Reasons Specific to Corporations


Corporations seem to be selected for three distinct reasons.

They carry on a business that is CRA’s flavour of the year; some prior flavours have been pharmacies, contractors and the real estate industry and any other industry CRA feels is a “cash is king” industry.

Corporations file General Indexed Financial Information known as GIFI. This information provides a comparative year to year summary of income and expenses. It is suspected by many accountants that CRA uses this information to review year to year expense and income variances of the filing corporation and to also compare corporations within a similar industry sector to identify those outside the standard ratios, but we don't know that for certain.

The final reason is that it is just your turn. I have no knowledge of this, but it seems like CRA just runs down a list and if you don’t get caught in regard to #1 or #2, your turn just eventually comes up.

In all cases it is imperative you keep your source documents to provide to the auditor; CRA more then ever wants source documents. It is also vitally important if you and not your accountant are meeting with the auditor, that you try and keep your cool. In the end, the auditor is just doing his or her job and if you treat them badly, you are not doing yourself any favours.

The blogs posted on The Blunt Bean Counter provide information of a general nature. These posts should not be considered specific advice; as each reader's personal financial situation is unique and fact specific. Please contact a professional advisor prior to implementing or acting upon any of the information contained in one of the blogs.

Friday, February 15, 2013

Tax Tweets of the Day for the Week Ending February 15, 2013

My Twitter tax tips for this week are listed below. My twitter handle is @bluntbeancountr. Most tips have a direct link, thus, I have little commentary this week.

Tips for Week of February 11 - February 15, 2013


If you sold collectibles in 2012; coins, stamps, china, they may not be taxable if proceeds are <$1,000. http://bit.ly/Y0cc0K  #blunttaxtip

If you have capital loss carryforwards, consider a flow through http://bit.ly/VLxgXs for 2013 to reduce taxes. #blunttaxtip

Did you know that safety deposit box fees are tax deductible? #blunttaxtip

Do you have unrealized capital losses & your spouse unrealized cap gains? Transfer your losses in 2013. http://bit.ly/RSGpgk
#blunttaxtip

Instead of cash #donations, consider donating public securities with capital gains. There is no tax on the gain. #blunttaxtip

Note: If you had a stock worth $1,000 with an adjusted cost base of $200 and sold the stock; at the highest marginal tax rate, you would have after-tax proceeds of approximately $815 ($1,000 less $185 tax). If you donated the $815, you would save approximately $380 in taxes from the donation assuming you had already made $200 in other donations, resulting in net tax savings of $195 ($380 less $185 tax).

However, if you donated the shares directly, the charity would receive $1,000 instead of $815 and you would save approximately $465 in taxes.

The blogs posted on The Blunt Bean Counter provide information of a general nature. These posts should not be considered specific advice; as each reader's personal financial situation is unique and fact specific. Please contact a professional advisor prior to implementing or acting upon any of the information contained in one of the blogs.

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

CRA Audit- Will I Be Selected?

I am often asked how the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) selects its audit victims; oops, I meant to say taxpayers subject to audit. Through experience I know certain taxpayers, certain claims and certain industries seem to trigger audits. With that in mind, I will list below what I have seen and how I believe the CRA selects certain individuals and businesses for audit.

Reasons for Individuals and Corporations

I would suggest there is nothing worse than a scorned lover, a business partner you have had a falling out with or a dismissed employee to trigger a CRA audit. These individuals know your little secrets; a cash deal here, an offshore account there and a conference you expensed that was really a vacation. These people are also vindictive and in some cases, they make statements and claims that are not factual in nature; however, the claims are enough to bring the CRA to your door.

CRA also loves net worth audits. These are audits undertaken because you live in a 3,000 square foot home, have a Porsche and kids in private school, and yet show minimal income on your tax return.  Typically CRA either stumbles upon these situations, or information from one of the individuals noted in the preceding paragraph provides a lead.

Reasons Specific to Individuals

We see far more desk audits (information requests in regard to certain deductions claimed) than full blown audits for individuals. You can expect an inquiry if you claim any of the following:
  • a significant interest expense,
  • an allowable business investment loss (usually if you held shares in a bankrupt private Canadian company),
  • tuition from a university outside Canada (typically the child and parent are tied together as most children transfer $5,000 of their tuition claim to their parents),
  • a child care claim for a nanny; even if you have filed a T4 for the nanny with CRA. Why CRA cannot crosscheck their records is baffling and befuddling.
In all the above cases you are just providing back-up information, these are not audits.

In past years individuals who purchased any tax shelter other than an oil & gas or mineral flow through have been audited. However, in most cases the CRA is auditing the tax shelter itself and the individual investors just get reassessed personally.

Full blown audits seem to occur with regularity in regard to individuals who earn commission income or self employment income and claim expenses against that income. In those cases, CRA gravitates to auto expense claims, requesting logs books they know one in 100 people actually keep, and advertising and promotion expenses they consider personal in nature.

Reasons Specific to Corporations

Corporations seem to be selected for three distinct reasons.

They carry on a business that is CRA’s flavour of the year; some prior flavours have been pharmacies, contractors and the real estate industry and any other industry CRA feels is a “cash is king” industry.

Corporations file General Indexed Financial Information known as GIFI. This information provides a comparative year to year summary of income and expenses. It is suspected by many accountants that CRA uses this information to review year to year expense and income variances of the filing corporation and to also compare corporations within a similar industry sector to identify those outside the standard ratios, but we don't know that for certain.

The final reason is that it is just your turn. I have no knowledge of this, but it seems like CRA just runs down a list and if you don’t get caught in regard to #1 or #2, your turn just eventually comes up.

In all cases it is imperative you keep your source documents to provide to the auditor; CRA more then ever wants source documents. It is also vitally important if you and not your accountant are meeting with the auditor, that you try and keep your cool. In the end, the auditor is just doing his or her job and if you treat them badly, you are not doing yourself any favours.

The blogs posted on The Blunt Bean Counter provide information of a general nature. These posts should not be considered specific advice; as each reader's personal financial situation is unique and fact specific. Please contact a professional advisor prior to implementing or acting upon any of the information contained in one of the blogs.